On Thinking

An introspective essay on the symbology behind duality, and one of the pieces that most directly bridges the framework's scientific and philosophical sides. It argues that science and religion, fractal and mandala, analysis and intuition are not opposites but two attentions turned on one world — and asks how far the felt task of 'seeing whole' corresponds to the integration of the brain's two hemispheres. Drawing on split-brain research, hemispheric asymmetry, Jungian psychology, the pineal gland as Descartes's 'seat of the soul,' and the neuroscience of endogenous DMT and ego-dissolution, it holds a deliberate seam between empirical finding and symbolic interpretation, closing on the quieting of the self-narrating mind as a path to inner peace. Though titled like an On——ing essay, it lives in the Scientific Theory section.

Though its title echoes the On——ing series, it lives in the Scientific Theory section because it does the section's characteristic work: holding empirical findings and symbolic readings in the same frame without collapsing either. It is one of the best places in the whole corpus to watch the register seam operate, moving between split-brain research and the mandala without ever confusing the two.

Read “On Thinking” (PDF) → Cite this work (DOI) →

Part of the open Legible Traces archive — every piece free under CC BY 4.0. The PDF here is byte-for-byte the record deposited on Zenodo; the DOI is the canonical citation. Return to All Works or the On ——ing series.