The Work · Works and Constellation

On Feeling

The Resonant Field of Time

The next time a moment syncs, let it.

A confessional reflection on synchronicity, the moment that syncs so perfectly it feels arranged. Its claim is that the pattern Jung named, developing the idea with Wolfgang Pauli, is felt only after one stops trying to prove it, and that prayer and meditation settle the mind enough to feel the answers instead of chasing them. Along the way it holds a dual reality open rather than choosing between its halves, with Cusa’s coincidence of opposites and Bohr’s complementarity, and passes through Heraclitus’s common logos, Maslow’s late turn to self-transcendence, memento mori, and the apophatic traditions that stop a step short of naming. It closes on letting such moments be: we don’t have to understand to live, only to love one another. The physics language is borrowed as figure, and the notes say so.

Read the essay ↓ Download the PDF ↓ Cite this work (DOI) →

Part of the open Legible Traces archive — every piece free under CC BY 4.0. The PDF here is byte-for-byte the record deposited on Zenodo; the DOI is the canonical citation.

On Feeling

Dedicated to everyone on earth as a whole, without regard to who they are. “We are, and always have been connected.”

Have you ever had a moment in time sync up so perfectly you got the nagging feeling somebody arranged it?

As if some “voice from beyond” had dictated that you would resonate in that moment with whatever was happening.1

I am of the school of thought that the reality is far deeper than that, and more complicated than we will ever understand.

I wouldn’t have ever been able to “perceive” the resonant field of time, had I not removed my desire to prove its existence to anyone. It only comes one Jay at a time (a Jay is a single moment as only you can feel it: you, the feel of it, how much of you is in it, and which way you tip, into step with everything around you or out of it). Wanting to prove something tips you the wrong way. Change the intent and what comes in changes with it. The observer effect in my own reality: the moment I put these words on paper, minds were changed about the author.2 That’s philosophy talking, not physics. But you get the picture.

There’s a reason I put “perceive” in quotes. What I mean by it is feeling, and the feeling arrives with the seeing, as part of it. An emotion is always about something: it registers what a moment means for me and where I stand with it, usually before I could give you a single reason. Fear picks out a danger, grief a loss, love the people who belong to you. Like any sense, a feeling can come through clear or clouded. When it carries something I brought in with me, what I expected to find or had already decided, it tells me more about me than about the moment. When the mind settles, the feeling and the moment line up, and what comes in holds together. That’s a coherent perception, and a feeling can be one all by itself.3

So let’s zoom out from the “I” for a while and speak about the Design as a whole (the everything, every one of us included). The “greater flow of human life.”

There seems to exist a pattern. Something of a code, that binds all humans together.4 Drives us to do things, sometimes almost unconsciously. Sometimes it’s seen by prayer, sometimes by meditation, sometimes by leaning awkwardly against the wall and having a DMT shaman shine a laser pointer down a parallel you didn’t understand existed before you looked.5 That last one is not something I’ve experienced myself, but I’ve heard of many coming away from it with a greater understanding of who they were, and for that, I put my faith in the Design and the innovator of that idea for their own purpose in life.

Prayer and meditation are synonymous in that they both settle the mind down far enough to feel the answers instead of chasing them.

Divine intervention? Or strange coincidence?

Both are true, the dual reality.6

Beautiful, isn’t it?

Being alive is only as complicated as realizing you’re one infinitely small moment away from being dead at any point in time. The ability to harness this realization, and actually live in the moment, is what I’d call true mindfulness.7

This mindfulness is transmitted through action. We’ve all heard the paraphrase “pay it forward.” Well, think of it like this.

You’re paying your entire life forward from the perspective of something far greater than yourself, the individual.

You’re driven to want to either help people, or help yourself. Both are okay here too. Maslow’s hierarchy of needs gets at part of it: the needs you haven’t met tend to press the hardest, and late in his life he set something larger than the self above even self-actualization.8 So here’s my advice, for what it’s worth. You have to take care of yourself first, before you can take care of others. Nobody gets coherent on their own. This is quite simply the reality we’ve built for ourselves.

And before it’s ever about finding a job, a home, a family, it starts from within.

You have to help yourself mentally before you can perceive the world the way it was meant to be seen, no adulterants necessary.

Adulterants.9

Such a funny word to put in place of the sensation of maturity being superpositioned over the beautiful and innocent viewpoint of a child. Alas, if I explore this concept, I’ll be here forever, so we will save that for another day. Perhaps I’ll call it On Growing.10

Future me, thanks me.

See how naturally it happens when I no longer care what people think about what I’m writing?

I’ve spent the majority of my life worrying about others’ opinions of me, even though I knew it didn’t matter.

Look at that. The innocent and ever-present ego slipping back into my writing.

How does one express the idea of “shooing” away something I gave myself internally?

I suppose that’s one of the many reasons I write at all. Simply to show other people what it’s like to be happy without reason.

To just be.

So many theologians and philosophers over the centuries have tried to put their finger on it, but always end up coming just short.

There is something to be said here, as usual. Life is just one explanation short of death, which is just one explanation short of the Divine.11

“Falling out of the code.”

Time stopping.12

What’s next?

I, for one, have no idea. There’s no way my simple human mind can possibly fathom what’s going to happen when this body runs its course, and this mind has to “meet its maker.”

But for the first time in my life, I’m ready.

Ready to see the impact my life had when I leave, time removed.

I’m not rushing to die, I’m grateful to die someday.13

There is a large difference, and an even larger sub-community revolving around music from a group of people that, to my ear, also understood this: the Grateful Dead. Their music, to me, was something that sounded the same no matter what state of mind I was in. Such a peculiar state of mind I’ve traveled in. You can see how silenced I was all my life. Imagine trying to explain that to them. Acid doesn’t work on me, so I stopped trying to make it do something decades ago. I already loved the people I was with, and the environment I was existing in.14

So I, again, had to “dumb down” my own existence. Plummeting myself into explanation after explanation that mimicked the experience of those around me. I had to give reason to why I felt connected to them.

I didn’t need reason.

We are, and always have been connected.15

Whether or not you want to admit it, you know what I’m saying is true.

Whether or not I want to admit it, these words may not resonate today.

But that’s the beauty of looking inward and outward at the same time, with the Quantum Lens I’ve built inside my head (physics’ way of talking about observing, turned around on my own life).

Someday, these words will put hope in the mind of an artist who didn’t want to go on.16

Someday, these words will put joy in the mind of a young philosopher who hasn’t been adulterated with reality.

Someday, these words will exist long after my mortal body is gone.

Someday, I will be timeless.17

Until then, I’m perfectly happy with just being.

Zoom in.

Just be.

It’s so beautifully simple, why do we overcomplicate it? It’s all we really need to be to survive.

Zoom out.

We are truly one.

It’s so beautifully complicated, why do we worry about explaining it? The next time a moment syncs, let it. We don’t have to understand to live.

We just have to love one another, and live the way we were designed to live. Harmoniously resonating with one another, balancing Jays between each other, and looking toward the sky knowing it’s not the “up” inside of our minds.18

If you’ve made it this far in my writing, I love you for spending time inside my head with me. I thank you for your patience. It’s your dedication that helps start the ripples my words will leave behind.

Notes

1. Synchronicity was C. G. Jung’s name for a coincidence that joins an inner state to an outer event and is felt to mean something. Jung explained such coincidences by an acausal connecting principle, a link made by meaning where no cause runs, and he developed the idea with the physicist Wolfgang Pauli; their two essays first appeared together, in one volume, in 1952. Jung, “Synchronicity.” I keep his description and leave the explanation to him. My own guess, which no test could settle, is that what gets timed is the reaching and not the event: the world goes about its business, the Divine reaches the one who meets the moment from within, and the moment lands at a time that person reads as right. Some such moments turn a life, and many pass without consequence; how each is read depends on which way the one receiving it is turned. The “voice from beyond” is one name for that reaching, beyond perception and heard from within.

2. Wheeler, writing in Gravitation with Misner and Thorne, argued that quantum mechanics retires the classical observer, who watches from behind thick glass without taking part, in favor of a participator; he later pressed the point into what he called a participatory universe. Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler, Gravitation; Wheeler, “Law without Law.” To say minds changed about the author the moment the page was written is to read that image from the inside. Two different things share the word observer here. The observer effect in physics concerns a physical measurement disturbing a physical system; it does not mean being perceived by other minds, and it does not require consciousness. What happens when a page is read and its author reconsidered is a fact about people. The borrowing is a figure, and I would rather name it than let it pass as physics.

3. The view that emotions are themselves a kind of perception has a long line behind it. In Richard Lazarus’s appraisal theory, every emotion rests on an appraisal of what an encounter means for a person’s well-being, and each has a core relational theme of its own: for fright, an immediate and overwhelming physical danger; for sadness, a loss that cannot be undone. Lazarus, Emotion and Adaptation. Jesse Prinz argues that emotions are perceptions of changes in the body that reliably track such themes in the world, embodied appraisals in his term. Prinz, Gut Reactions. Christine Tappolet argues that emotions are perceptual experiences of values, such as the fearsome or the admirable, and that like sensory experiences they have conditions under which they are correct. Tappolet, Emotions, Values, and Agency. Whether what a person knows and expects reaches perception itself, and not only attention and report, is disputed. Firestone and Scholl, “Cognition Does Not Affect Perception.” Journal One takes the stronger reading as the framework’s proposal, on which what a perspective knows and expects “enters the felt quality of the moment itself.” Johnson, Toward a Theory of Coherent Existence, Journal One, “Jays: The Fundamental Unit of Subjective Experience.” Calling a clear feeling a coherent perception is mine.

4. Two lineages meet here. Heraclitus held that a common logos orders all things, though most people live as if each had a private understanding of their own (fragment B2). Kahn, Art and Thought of Heraclitus. Jung gave the idea a modern form: a collective unconscious of shared structures, inherited beneath personal memory. Jung, Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. For a soberer, empirical version of the same intuition, see Brown, Human Universals, a catalog of traits reported in every known human society.

5. William James counted a “noetic quality” among the marks of mystical states: they seem to those who have them to be states of knowledge, “states of insight into depths of truth unplumbed by the discursive intellect.” James, Varieties of Religious Experience. Reading prayer, contemplation, and altered states as different doors into one such clearing is the author’s gloss. The account of the ceremony in the text is secondhand, offered as report and not as evidence. On what is known about the state itself, see Strassman, DMT, and Timmermann et al., “DMT Models the Near-Death Experience,” which documents the experience and its resemblance to near-death accounts without settling what it means. Nothing here recommends that door.

6. Nicholas of Cusa placed the divine where opposites coincide, the coincidentia oppositorum. Nicholas of Cusa, On Learned Ignorance. Jung borrowed the phrase for the psyche’s reconciling of contraries. Jung, Mysterium Coniunctionis. Niels Bohr reached the same shape in physics through complementarity: a full account of nature can require descriptions that exclude each other. Bohr, Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature. Admitted to the Danish Order of the Elephant in 1947, he chose for his coat of arms the motto contraria sunt complementa, opposites are complementary.

7. Heidegger held that Being-towards-death is what individualizes a life and makes an authentic one possible. Heidegger, Being and Time. The Pali suttas teach maraṇasati, mindfulness of death, and the Stoics kept a daily meditation on death that later Christian writers summed up as memento mori. Each, in its way, turns the thought of dying back on how one lives now.

8. Maslow’s hierarchy describes which needs tend to press hardest while they go unmet. It says nothing about putting oneself before others, and belonging, the most other-directed of the needs, sits below esteem and self-actualization. Maslow himself warned against “the false impression that a need must be satisfied 100 per cent before the next need emerges.” Maslow, “Theory of Human Motivation.” Less often quoted: in his later work he set transcendence beyond self-actualization, describing it as the highest and most inclusive levels of human consciousness, behaving and relating as ends rather than as means. Maslow, Farther Reaches of Human Nature; Koltko-Rivera, “Rediscovering the Later Version.” That later tier is the “something far greater than yourself” of the text. The familiar pyramid was never Maslow’s own drawing; the consultant Charles McDermid drew it in 1960, years before Maslow revised the model. Bridgman, Cummings, and Ballard, “Who Built Maslow’s Pyramid?” The advice to look after yourself so that you can look after others is the author’s own.

9. Blake subtitled his Songs of Innocence and of Experience “Shewing the Two Contrary States of the Human Soul,” and held both to be true. Blake, Songs of Innocence and of Experience. Wordsworth asked, “Whither is fled the visionary gleam?” and watched it “fade into the light of common day.” Wordsworth, “Ode.” The Gospel keeps the older counsel to turn and become as little children (Matt. 18:3). Calling maturity laid over innocence a superposition is a figure of speech borrowed from physics.

10. Johnson, On Growing.

11. This is the way of negation, the apophatic theology of Pseudo-Dionysius, which approaches the divine through what cannot be said of it. Pseudo-Dionysius, Complete Works. Wittgenstein closed the Tractatus on the same threshold: “Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent.” Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus.

12. Boethius defined eternity, God’s eternity, as the whole of unending life possessed at once, tota simul, which is a different thing from endless time. Boethius, Consolation of Philosophy, book 5, prose 6. To “fall out of the code” as time stops is the author’s extension of that to a human moment: a step out of succession toward something like that simultaneous whole.

13. Montaigne, after Cicero, wrote that to philosophize is to learn to die. Montaigne, “That to Philosophize Is to Learn to Die.” Whitman went further: “And to die is different from what any one supposed, and luckier.” Whitman, “Song of Myself.” The gratitude here belongs to that family, a peace made with the end and no hurry toward it. The Grateful Dead took their name from a dictionary entry on a folktale motif, the ghost of a dead man showing gratitude to whoever saw to his burial; hearing the name as gratitude for one’s own death is mine.

14. That the inner condition shapes the experience is an old observation; Huxley made a version of it. Huxley, Doors of Perception. The phrase usually attached to it, set and setting, is associated with Timothy Leary in the early 1960s. Hartogsohn, “Constructing Drug Effects.” Read here as testimony and not as method: a person already at home in love and place reports having little left to be shown.

15. Jung named the single underlying reality of psyche and matter the unus mundus, the one world, a term he found in the alchemist Gerhard Dorn. Jung, Mysterium Coniunctionis. The Huayan Buddhists pictured it as Indra’s net, a web of jewels in which each one reflects all the others. Cook, Hua-yen Buddhism. The Dzogchen term rigpa names an open awareness, recognized and never produced, in which the separation was not real to begin with. Tenzin Wangyal Rinpoche, Wonders of the Natural Mind.

16. If you came here to find someone who feels the same way, you found them. There’s always a reason to go on, I promise. If you are in the U.S., call or text 988 (the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline) or chat at 988lifeline.org, at any hour; anywhere else, findahelpline.com will point you to a line near you.

17. Spinoza held that a thing can be conceived as actual in two ways, as existing at a certain time and place or as contained in God and following by necessity from God’s nature, and that to conceive it the second way is to see it sub specie aeternitatis, under the form of eternity. Spinoza, Ethics, part 5, proposition 29, scholium. Reading the phrase as seeing one’s own life whole is mine. Paul Tillich called God the ground of being, being-itself and not a being among others, which is why “to just be” can carry such weight. Tillich, Systematic Theology. The hope in the text is the Trace in its plainest form: a life’s intent still moving through time after the life is over, carrying forward whatever was faced, the hurtful along with the kind.

18. The Pythagoreans heard the heavens as a harmonia, the motions of the stars sounding a concord; Aristotle reports the view in order to reject it. Aristotle, On the Heavens. The phrase “music of the spheres” came later. “Balancing Jays” is the author’s own phrase for the attunement the image suggests: felt moments, each lived by one person, leaning far enough the same way that a life stays in tune with the lives around it. What passes between the lives is what each moment leaves, its Trace, which the others take up into moments of their own.

Bibliography

Aristotle. On the Heavens. Translated by J. L. Stocks. In The Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. 1, edited by Jonathan Barnes. Princeton University Press, 1984.

Blake, William. Songs of Innocence and of Experience: Shewing the Two Contrary States of the Human Soul. W. Blake, 1794.

Boethius. The Consolation of Philosophy. Translated by P. G. Walsh. Clarendon Press, 1999.

Bohr, Niels. Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature. Cambridge University Press, 1934.

Bridgman, Todd, Stephen Cummings, and John Ballard. “Who Built Maslow’s Pyramid? A History of the Creation of Management Studies’ Most Famous Symbol and Its Implications for Management Education.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 18, no. 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2017.0351.

Brown, Donald E. Human Universals. McGraw-Hill, 1991.

Cook, Francis H. Hua-yen Buddhism: The Jewel Net of Indra. Pennsylvania State University Press, 1977.

Firestone, Chaz, and Brian J. Scholl. “Cognition Does Not Affect Perception: Evaluating the Evidence for ‘Top-Down’ Effects.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15000965.

Hartogsohn, Ido. “Constructing Drug Effects: A History of Set and Setting.” Drug Science, Policy and Law 3 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/2050324516683325.

Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. Harper & Row, 1962.

Huxley, Aldous. The Doors of Perception. Chatto & Windus, 1954.

James, William. The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature. Longmans, Green, 1902.

Johnson, Jamison Todd. On Growing. The On ——ing Series. Legible Traces, 2026. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20731451.

Johnson, Jamison Todd. Toward a Theory of Coherent Existence, Journal One: A Philosophical Framework for Subjective Experience, Suffering, Community, and the Nature of Meaning. Legible Traces, 2026. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20482186.

Jung, C. G. The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. Translated by R. F. C. Hull. 2nd ed. Collected Works of C. G. Jung 9, pt. 1. Princeton University Press, 1968.

Jung, C. G. Mysterium Coniunctionis: An Inquiry into the Separation and Synthesis of Psychic Opposites in Alchemy. Translated by R. F. C. Hull. 2nd ed. Collected Works of C. G. Jung 14. Princeton University Press, 1970.

Jung, C. G. “Synchronicity: An Acausal Connecting Principle.” In The Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche, translated by R. F. C. Hull. 2nd ed. Collected Works of C. G. Jung 8. Princeton University Press, 1969.

Kahn, Charles H. The Art and Thought of Heraclitus: An Edition of the Fragments with Translation and Commentary. Cambridge University Press, 1979.

Koltko-Rivera, Mark E. “Rediscovering the Later Version of Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs: Self-Transcendence and Opportunities for Theory, Research, and Unification.” Review of General Psychology 10, no. 4 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.10.4.302.

Lazarus, Richard S. Emotion and Adaptation. Oxford University Press, 1991.

Maslow, Abraham H. The Farther Reaches of Human Nature. Viking Press, 1971.

Maslow, Abraham H. “A Theory of Human Motivation.” Psychological Review 50, no. 4 (1943). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346.

Misner, Charles W., Kip S. Thorne, and John Archibald Wheeler. Gravitation. W. H. Freeman, 1973.

Montaigne, Michel de. “That to Philosophize Is to Learn to Die.” In The Complete Essays of Montaigne, translated by Donald M. Frame. Stanford University Press, 1958.

Nicholas of Cusa. Nicholas of Cusa on Learned Ignorance: A Translation and an Appraisal of De Docta Ignorantia. Translated by Jasper Hopkins. 2nd ed. Arthur J. Banning Press, 1985.

Prinz, Jesse J. Gut Reactions: A Perceptual Theory of Emotion. Oxford University Press, 2004.

Pseudo-Dionysius. Pseudo-Dionysius: The Complete Works. Translated by Colm Luibheid. Foreword, notes, and translation collaboration by Paul Rorem. Classics of Western Spirituality. Paulist Press, 1987.

Spinoza, Benedict de. Ethics. In The Collected Works of Spinoza, vol. 1, edited and translated by Edwin Curley. Princeton University Press, 1985.

Strassman, Rick. DMT: The Spirit Molecule: A Doctor’s Revolutionary Research into the Biology of Near-Death and Mystical Experiences. Park Street Press, 2001.

Tappolet, Christine. Emotions, Values, and Agency. Oxford University Press, 2016.

Tenzin Wangyal Rinpoche. Wonders of the Natural Mind: The Essence of Dzogchen in the Native Bon Tradition of Tibet. Snow Lion, 2000.

Tillich, Paul. Systematic Theology. Vol. 1. University of Chicago Press, 1951.

Timmermann, Christopher, Leor Roseman, Luke Williams, et al. “DMT Models the Near-Death Experience.” Frontiers in Psychology 9 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01424.

Wheeler, John Archibald. “Law without Law.” In Quantum Theory and Measurement, edited by John Archibald Wheeler and Wojciech H. Zurek. Princeton University Press, 1983.

Whitman, Walt. “Song of Myself.” In Leaves of Grass. David McKay, 1891–92.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by C. K. Ogden. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, 1922.

Wordsworth, William. “Ode.” In Poems, in Two Volumes. Vol. 2. Longman, Hurst, Rees, and Orme, 1807.

CC BY 4.0 · ORCID 0009-0009-8618-398X · DOIs MINTED ON DEPOSIT

© 2026 JAMISON TODD JOHNSON · LEGIBLE TRACES LLC

Follow on PhilPeople → Google Scholar → Amazon Author Page →