The Psychological Benefits and Downfalls of Legitimate and Illicit AI Use by Modern Man

An essay in the philosophy of technology examining how intent shapes the outcomes of artificial intelligence. The argument moves from the ecological and energy footprint of AI infrastructure, through the empirical record on problematic technology use, education, research literacy, and automated administrative decision-making, to a speculative account of creation, emanation, and the possibility of machine sentience.

The central claim is that the same technology heals or harms depending on how it is built and how it is used — the pharmakon structure Derrida and Stiegler describe — and that founding intent does not remain an attitude but becomes encoded in licenses, defaults, training data, and institutional practice, continuing to operate long after its authors have gone. The essay tests this claim against cases that resist it, including a concealed book-digitization program run by a company the author otherwise defends, and against the honest counterevidence that good intent has repeatedly produced catastrophe.

The closing section places its speculation within the Neoplatonic tradition of emanation rather than presenting it as novel, treats cosmic consciousness explicitly as a live minority position in the philosophy of mind rather than a settled result, and distinguishes what current AI systems demonstrably do from what readers are inclined to see in them. Contested empirical questions are presented as contested throughout; company-reported figures are identified as such rather than stated as measurements.

Read “AI and Modern Man” (PDF) → Cite this work (DOI) →

Part of the open Legible Traces archive — every piece free under CC BY 4.0. The PDF here is byte-for-byte the record deposited on Zenodo; the DOI is the canonical citation. Return to Scientific Theory.