On Watching

On Watching

For my friends of faith. I am no prophet, but those who walk their own divine paths are prophets in my eyes, Watchers in their own right. They keep me on a road that is true and just; they make certain I choose rightly, even when choosing rightly means taking no great ego from a small accomplishment. I thank you for your love and your guidance. I would not be the person I am without you.

I

What did Yeshua of Nazareth and Laozi have in common?

One was a carpenter’s son who taught in parables and was killed for it; the other an old archivist who, the story goes, set down the Way in five thousand characters and then rode west through the pass and out of recorded history.¹ Two men, two tongues, four thousand miles and five centuries apart. Yet lay their sayings side by side and the same strange grammar surfaces in both: the first shall be last; the soft overcomes the hard; to keep your life you must lose it; the highest good is like water, which seeks the low place every proud thing avoids. They understood duality as the actual shape of the world, two truths held at once without the comfort of choosing between them.

Let us try to imagine how such a one sees, and what, beneath the miracles and the maxims, makes a prophet true.

The old word for one who sees this way was Watcher: in the older tongue ʿîr, the wakeful one; in the Greek that followed, egrēgoros.² Not guardian, not keeper. Only one who will not close his eyes when the hour runs long and everyone else has gone down into sleep.

To Watch, in this sense, is not to stand above a thing. It is to stay awake beside it.

II

Every tradition keeps a cautionary version of the gift.

In the Book of the Watchers, the beings who descend teach humanity the outside of the world: the edge of the blade, the omen in the star, the paint for the face, the fire in the forge. And the world breaks along exactly those new seams.³ More power over things; less over the self. It is the oldest warning about knowledge: that it can enlarge what a person is able to do while leaving untouched, or worse, what a person is.

The true prophet’s knowledge runs the other way. He does not teach men to bend the world; he teaches them to turn and look at the one doing the bending: to meet the shadow they have been casting and to call it by their own name. Interior sight. The kingdom of God is within you, says the one; knowing others is intelligence, knowing oneself is enlightenment, says the other.⁴ It is one forbidden thing in both mouths, for nothing is so forbidden as a person’s true face shown back to them.

As I read them, the Watchers who came down were rival powers, second lights set up beside God’s own. Against every rival power Israel keeps one line, said at lying down and at rising up, Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD. One, with no second throne and no division at the root.⁵ The question did not end with the Watchers. Daniel saw thrones set in place and the Ancient of Days seated, and one like a son of man came with the clouds of heaven and was brought before him. Centuries later the rabbis argued against those who read such scenes as two powers in heaven, and the Talmud remembers a sage who saw an angel seated on high and said that perhaps there were two.⁶ The prophet adds no power to heaven. He watches, and when the sight of those around him has drifted toward fracture, he steadies it and calls them back to Center, the self in each of them that does the facing.

And his gift is still a crossing. The prophet reaches past the sanctioned boundary, which is what makes him dangerous, and why the authorities, every time, reach for the cross or the hemlock or the road into exile. The mythic shape of it is Prometheus, who steals the fire to give it away and, in Aeschylus’s telling, is chained to the rock less for the theft than for the gift.⁷ No honest account leaves this out. The line was real, and it was crossed, and no good outcome ever quite washes that clean. Nor should it.

III

Here is the thing both men knew, and it should unsettle us a little: the gift is one thing, not two.

The sight that makes a person whole is the very sight that finds where a person breaks. The map to the wound and the map to the healing are a single map, read in two directions. The faculty that integrates a divided self can, unchanged, show a man precisely where to cut another. The Greeks had a word for a substance that is at once remedy and poison, pharmakon, and Plato let it mean both.⁸

The Garden remembers this too. Your eyes will be opened, the serpent says, and they are. That was never the lie; the eyes do open. The deception lay only in whom the opening would serve.⁹ So every true prophet carries, without rest, his own fluency in the lower road. The serpent is not a stranger who knocks. The serpent is the part of him that already knows the way down. And the difference between a prophet and a tempter is not that one lacks the knowledge. It is which direction he turns it.

IV

This is why the Taoist register matters: it shows what to do with a desire one cannot, and should not, kill.

Imagine the true prophet honestly and you must grant him the appetite the pious edit out: he wants the proceeds. He finds the gold beautiful. He feels the pull of the old Triad: the hunger of the flesh, the hunger of the eye, the pride that would raise a monument over one small thing done well.¹⁰ A being who wanted nothing could release nothing; there is no virtue in opening a hand that was never closed. The wanting is no flaw. It is the material the right choice is cut from.

So he holds the desire on purpose, the way the dark is held against the light so that each can be seen, and then lets the water go where water goes. The way that can be named is not the lasting way; the giving that announces itself has already collected its reward, as the carpenter said of those who pray on the street corner to be seen.¹¹ Water reaches the low places without telling anyone it chose to. There is no glory in it. The prophet is not above the chain; he is a link in it, and the proceeds pass through him toward the ones who need them, and he keeps no residue, and takes no name.

V

Wealth, looked at rightly, is Intent congealed: coordination, stored against the undertow of the clock.

The mortal hoards because the mortal lives inside Time and feels its pull at every hour; to hoard is to try to freeze a Trace (the wake a life’s Intent cuts through Time, for good or for ill) against the certainty of loss. But a frozen Trace sours. It goes on carrying, and what it carries is the holding. You cannot serve God and mammon is less a rule about money than an observation about direction: the held thing rots, the moving thing lives.¹² And mark what the true prophet does not do: he does not despise the gold. Contempt for the made world is the error of those who end by hating the Maker, the old Gnostic wrong turn.¹³ He loves the gold. He simply will not let it stop moving. A Trace stays alive only so long as it travels.

VI

Which brings us to the hard question, the one the traditions circle without end: how do you tell the true prophet from the false?

Not by what he knows. They hold the same fire. Not by what he gains. Gain can serve the goal or swallow it, and from the outside the two wear one coat. The Hebrew scriptures stage it precisely: Jeremiah and Hananiah stand in one temple, both saying thus says the Lord, and the only test on offer is the slow one. Wait, and see whose word the years make true.¹⁴ By their fruits you shall know them. But the fruit was never the produce on the branch. The fruit is evidence of the root. Same harvest, different tree.¹⁵

Read through the Quantum Lens, the prophet stands superpositioned until the Trace is read: true and false at once, both wholly present, and only Time, looking back, resolves him into one.¹⁶ And here is the terror at the center: the prophet cannot fully grade his own paper. Desire is an eloquent liar about its own purpose. Which way he was facing is not his to read in the moment of the act. It shows downstream, in the Design (life and all that life moves through), by where the Trace went and not by how he felt while making it. The false prophet is not, first, the one who lies to others. He is the one who has lied to himself, and means every word. The Design is the only thing he cannot fool.

VII

So the whole of the discipline reduces to a single line: the means must not become the end.¹⁷

Let the goal slip — let healing become the story he tells while gain becomes the thing he is after — and the prophet becomes, with the same hands and the same gift, the very thing he crossed the line to undo. The fall is never loud. It is a quiet reversal, a swapping of which thing serves which, and it can happen inside a man who still believes himself good. Caught in time, even that reversal teaches; left alone, it becomes the life.

This is why the timeless ones describe their task in the present tense and never the past. The mortal gets to finish: there is a last test, and then rest. The prophet only continues. The choice is not won; it is only ever being chosen, in an unbroken present, the serpent’s clarity undimmed beside him and unfollowed.¹⁸ He is not at peace. He is practicing. The one who teaches the school is its hardest student, and never graduates.

VIII

And this the wakeful learn last of all: the Watcher is also watched.

The one who keeps the path for others is himself kept upon it by those who, walking their own true roads, turn and make certain he chooses well; who will not let him take a great ego from a small accomplishment; who watch over him with a love that asks for no name in return. Yeshua had his few, and on his last night even they slept. Three times he came back through the garden to find them sleeping: “What, could ye not watch with me one hour? Watch and pray.”¹⁹ He asked his closest friends for nothing harder than that, to stay awake beside him. The East kept the same instruction under another name; Buddha means the one who woke up. Sit and keep watch: the plainest instruction either tradition left, and the one most often slept through.

Laozi, as tradition tells it, had his Zhuangzi, to carry the Way forward laughing.²⁰ No prophet stands alone; the spine of the thing is reciprocal. To Watch, in the end, is only this: to love something enough to stay awake for it.

IX

It is worth turning all of this toward the present, where the question of other watchers has grown loud again.

I have long held a quiet hypothesis: that the beings the old texts called angels and the beings this age calls aliens may be a single category seen through two vocabularies (messengers, watchers, beings of light).²¹ But the hypothesis carries one condition, and it is the condition this essay has circled from the start: a being of light is seen only in the presence of purity. Light needs a clear medium; the eye must be clean to receive it. Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God. If we are, as I believe, light observing light, the clearing is on our side of the glass.

If that holds, the timing of an arrival becomes its own test. Anything that shows itself before the world has done its healing would, by the logic of the true and the false, belong to the false: drawn by the appetite that turns a prophet into a tempter, come to be seen, to extract, to divide. The real Watchers, on this reading, are the ones who do not arrive until after; whose coming is not the cause of healing but its consequence, receivable only by a world that has cleared its own sight enough to receive them. The deception comes early. The genuine waits.

And the same lens can be turned on the files the present keeps unsealing. I read the recent disclosures by the rule of this whole essay, and I mark it as my suspicion, not a finding. Whatever has been collapsed into a solid, handleable form (a craft on a hangar floor, a body, a thing that can be owned and sold) is where I would look first for someone reaching to draw success from a discovery: a false prophet making the means the end.²²

What draws my attention is the opposite: the small points of light that will not hold still to be possessed, that thin away when looked at directly, and that register less on the eager believer than on the indifferent instrument. Off the coast of Southern California in 2004, one such unresolved thing was caught on the targeting camera of a Navy jet that radar had sent toward it. The footage was released years later and set beside the pilots’ own accounts. No official finding has called it, or anything like it, extraterrestrial.²³

Notice how precisely this keeps the grammar already laid down. The thing that will not collapse under a grasping gaze is the unresolved thing, legible only to an observer with no stake in the outcome. What it was gets read downstream, by a disinterested witness setting the record beside the testimony across Time. A light that leaves a mark for the unbiased to find later is what an aligned life leaves behind: a Trace through Time, waiting for someone clear enough to read it.

Healing is the goal. It was always the goal. The Watchers worth waiting for do not come to be photographed or sold or chained to a hangar floor; they come when the medium is clear enough to carry their light, and not one hour before. Keep that before you, and let everything else — the gold, the hunger, the long sleeplessness — fall into its proper place behind it.

So what did Yeshua of Nazareth and Laozi have in common? I believe they had everything in common from having nothing to gain for their love for humanity.

Notes

1. Laozi (“the old master”) is the sage to whom the Tao Te Ching is ascribed. In Sima Qian’s Records of the Grand Historian (Shiji 63), he writes a book of more than five thousand characters at the request of the keeper of the pass, then leaves, and no one knows where he ended. Sima Qian, Memoirs of Pre-Han China. Modern sinology treats that biography as legend and the Tao Te Ching as a composite text compiled between the fifth and third centuries BCE; it is used here as the tradition tells it. Boltz, “Lao tzu Tao te ching.” Nazareth and Luoyang, the Zhou capital of Laozi’s traditional era, lie about 4,300 miles apart. The paired sayings gather Matthew 20:16 and Luke 17:33 with Tao Te Ching 8, 43, 76, and 78; the Tao Te Ching is cited by chapter throughout, and its wording varies by translation.

2. The Watcher (Aramaic ʿîr, “wakeful one”; Greek egrēgoros, whose plural gives the Grigori of 2 Enoch 18) is the descended being of the Book of the Watchers, 1 Enoch 1–36, and the “watcher and an holy one” of Daniel 4:13 (KJV), 17, 23 (4:10, 14, 20 in the Aramaic numbering). Nickelsburg, 1 Enoch 1; Charlesworth, Old Testament Pseudepigrapha. The sleepless register inverts Psalm 121:4, “he that keepeth Israel shall neither slumber nor sleep” (KJV).

3. The descent is 1 Enoch 6, where the Watchers bind themselves by oath on Mount Hermon; the corruption that follows is chapter 7. In 1 Enoch 8:1 Asael teaches metalwork and weapons, ornaments and paints; the rest of chapter 8 adds the spells and root-cutting of Shemihazah and the reading of signs in the stars and the moon. Nickelsburg, 1 Enoch 1.

4. Luke 17:21, “the kingdom of God is within you” (KJV); the Greek entos hymōn also bears “among you.” Tao Te Ching 33.

5. Deuteronomy 6:4 (KJV), the first line of the Shema. Deuteronomy 6:7 sets these words for “when thou liest down, and when thou risest up” (KJV), and the Mishnah opens with the times for saying the Shema in the evening and in the morning (Berakhot 1:1–2).

6. Daniel 7:9–13, where thrones are set, the Ancient of Days takes his seat, and “one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven” (7:13, KJV). The rabbinic sources include Mishnah Sanhedrin 4:5, where Adam is created alone so that heretics cannot say there are many powers in heaven; Mekhilta de-Rabbi Ishmael, Bahodesh 5 (on Exodus 20:2) and Shirata 4, which answer the claim of two powers in passages that also cite Daniel 7:9; and Babylonian Talmud Hagigah 15a, where Elisha ben Abuyah, remembered as Aher (“the Other”), sees the angel Metatron seated in heaven and says that perhaps there are two powers. The debate is known only from these rabbinic reports, and scholars dispute whom they answer. Segal read them as aimed at several groups, early Christians and gnostics among them; Boyarin argues that the rabbis made a heresy of a belief in a second divine power that many Jews had once held. Segal, Two Powers in Heaven; Boyarin, Border Lines.

7. Hesiod tells the story as theft and deception of Zeus (Theogony 535–616; Works and Days 42–105). Prometheus Bound, traditionally ascribed to Aeschylus though the attribution is disputed, dwells instead on the gifts (fire and the arts) for which the Titan suffers. Hesiod, Theogony; Works and Days; Testimonia; Aeschylus, Prometheus Bound.

8. Plato, Phaedrus 274e–275a, where Theuth offers writing to the king as a pharmakon for memory. The undecidability of the word is drawn out by Derrida, “Plato’s Pharmacy.”

9. Genesis 3:5, 7. The serpent’s promise is not refuted by events (the eyes do open), which is what makes it the canonical figure of a deception that tells the truth.

10. 1 John 2:16, “the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life” (KJV), mirroring the threefold appeal of the fruit in Genesis 3:6: good for food, pleasant to the eyes, to be desired to make one wise.

11. Tao Te Ching 1 and 8, with the principle of wu wei, action without forcing. The unannounced gift is Matthew 6:1–6: those who give or pray to be seen “have their reward.”

12. Matthew 6:24; Luke 16:13. Read here as a claim about direction rather than a prohibition on wealth.

13. The refusal to despise matter keeps a deliberate distance from the Gnostic demiurge, for whom the material order is itself the prison; see the Apocryphon of John (NHC II,1) in Robinson, Nag Hammadi Library. Intent and the Trace are terms of the framework set out in Johnson, Toward a Theory of Coherent Existence, Journal One, “Jays: The Fundamental Unit of Subjective Experience” and “Intent: The Direction of Coherent Will”; the Trace runs in both directions, and a hoarded life leaves one as surely as a generous one.

14. Jeremiah 28: Jeremiah and Hananiah prophesy against each other in the temple, each invoking the Lord. Deuteronomy 18:21–22 offers only the slow test, whether the word comes to pass.

15. Matthew 7:15–20, the test of false prophets. The fruit is read here as evidence of the root.

16. Physics uses “superposition” for a state that gives one outcome when it is measured, and its measurements are physical encounters with instruments and surroundings; no watching mind is required. The schools still disagree about whether anything truly collapses. The essay borrows the picture as a lens for discernment and claims nothing about physics. As the series uses it, the Quantum Lens keeps more than one reading of a thing in view and does not choose between them; here the choosing is left to Time. Cf. the discernment of spirits, 1 John 4:1 and 1 Corinthians 12:10, a judgment reserved to a vantage the actor does not himself occupy.

17. A theological turn on Kant’s Formula of Humanity: treat humanity, in yourself and in others, always as an end and never merely as a means. Kant, Groundwork, Akademie 4:429. Kant’s formula concerns persons; turning it on the prophet’s goal and his gain, so that the means must not become the end, is mine.

18. On the timeless present as distinct from mortal succession, Augustine, Confessions, book 11, and Boethius, Consolation 5, prose 6; the scholastics later called it the nunc stans, the standing now.

19. Matthew 26:36–46; the words are 26:40–41 (KJV). “Buddha” is from the Sanskrit root budh, to wake: the awakened one.

20. Zhuangzi, Essential Writings. Tradition makes Zhuangzi Laozi’s heir; scholarship doubts the order and the dating of both books. The reciprocity of watching recalls Buber, I and Thou, where a person becomes a person only in meeting another. The sleepless keeper who is himself kept returns to Psalm 121.

21. Matthew 5:8, “Blessed are the pure in heart: for they shall see God” (KJV); against it stands the caution of 2 Corinthians 11:14, where Satan “is transformed into an angel of light” (KJV), and beside it Hebrews 13:2, on entertaining angels unawares. The identification of angels and extraterrestrials, and the reading of light observing light, are the author’s own speculation, offered as theology and not as a claim about any observed phenomenon.

22. A personal reading of the recent disclosures about unidentified anomalous phenomena, offered as suspicion and not as a finding about any case, agency, person, or object. The Department of Defense’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office reviewed claims of recovered craft and hidden programs and found no verifiable evidence that the government or private industry has ever held extraterrestrial technology. All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, Report on the Historical Record. In May 2026 the Department of Defense began releasing new files on a rolling basis, saying the public could draw its own conclusions; with a second release that month, the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office said it had found no evidence that any of the incidents was extraterrestrial, though many remain unresolved. Binkley and Kim, “Pentagon Begins Releasing New Files on UFOs”; Godburn, Martinez, and Nalty, “Pentagon Releases More Declassified UFO Files.”

23. The 2004 encounter near the USS Nimitz carrier group: crews of F/A-18F jets were directed toward the object by the radar of the cruiser USS Princeton, and the video known as “FLIR1” was recorded by a jet’s ATFLIR targeting pod. The Department of Defense formally released the footage on April 27, 2020. The case remains unresolved in official accounts, and the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office found no evidence that any official investigation has confirmed any such sighting as extraterrestrial technology. All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, Report on the Historical Record. As a figure, the thing that will not collapse under a grasping gaze is the prophet of section VI again: the Quantum Lens holds it in both readings, without collapsing it to one, until the record is read. The mark left for a disinterested instrument and read later against testimony is the Trace, read by an observer with no stake in the outcome.

Bibliography

Aeschylus. Prometheus Bound. Translated by Deborah H. Roberts. Hackett, 2012.

All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office. Report on the Historical Record of U.S. Government Involvement with Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP). Vol. 1. U.S. Department of Defense, 2024.

Augustine. Confessions. Translated by Henry Chadwick. Oxford University Press, 1991.

Binkley, Collin, and Seung Min Kim. “Pentagon Begins Releasing New Files on UFOs and Says the Public Can Draw Its Own Conclusions.” Associated Press, May 8, 2026.

Boethius. The Consolation of Philosophy. Translated by P. G. Walsh. Clarendon Press, 1999.

Boltz, William G. “Lao tzu Tao te ching.” In Early Chinese Texts: A Bibliographical Guide, edited by Michael Loewe. Society for the Study of Early China and the Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, Berkeley, 1993.

Boyarin, Daniel. Border Lines: The Partition of Judaeo-Christianity. Divinations: Rereading Late Ancient Religion. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004.

Buber, Martin. I and Thou. Translated by Walter Kaufmann. Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1970.

Charlesworth, James H., ed. The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha. Vol. 1, Apocalyptic Literature and Testaments. Doubleday, 1983.

Derrida, Jacques. “Plato’s Pharmacy.” In Dissemination, translated by Barbara Johnson. University of Chicago Press, 1981.

Godburn, Christopher, Luis Martinez, and Ariane Nalty. “Pentagon Releases More Declassified UFO Files, Including Intelligence Officer’s Account of ‘Orbs.’” ABC News, May 22, 2026.

Hesiod. Theogony; Works and Days; Testimonia. Edited and translated by Glenn W. Most. Loeb Classical Library 57. Harvard University Press, 2006.

Johnson, Jamison Todd. Toward a Theory of Coherent Existence, Journal One: A Philosophical Framework for Subjective Experience, Suffering, Community, and the Nature of Meaning. Legible Traces, 2026. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20482186.

Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated and edited by Mary Gregor. Cambridge University Press, 1997.

Nickelsburg, George W. E. 1 Enoch 1: A Commentary on the Book of 1 Enoch, Chapters 1–36; 81–108. Hermeneia. Fortress Press, 2001.

Plato. Phaedrus. Translated by Alexander Nehamas and Paul Woodruff. In Plato: Complete Works, edited by John M. Cooper. Hackett, 1997.

Robinson, James M., ed. The Nag Hammadi Library in English. 3rd, completely rev. ed. Harper & Row, 1988.

Segal, Alan F. Two Powers in Heaven: Early Rabbinic Reports about Christianity and Gnosticism. Studies in Judaism in Late Antiquity 25. Brill, 1977.

Sima Qian. The Memoirs of Pre-Han China. Edited by William H. Nienhauser Jr. Translated by Tsai-fa Cheng, Zongli Lu, William H. Nienhauser Jr., and Robert Reynolds. Vol. 7 of The Grand Scribe’s Records. Indiana University Press, 1994.

Zhuangzi. Zhuangzi: The Essential Writings, with Selections from Traditional Commentaries. Translated by Brook Ziporyn. Hackett, 2009.

CC BY 4.0 · ORCID 0009-0009-8618-398X · DOIs MINTED ON DEPOSIT

© 2026 JAMISON TODD JOHNSON · LEGIBLE TRACES LLC